As the search continues for missing Nancy Guthrie, attention has turned to the man leading the investigation. Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos is currently under probe over allegations that he misrepresented details on his resume before taking office.
The controversy surfaced following a March report by The Arizona Republic, which cited records suggesting discrepancies in his employment history. Nanos addressed the issue through his attorney in a submission to the Pima County Board of Supervisors earlier this week.
The development comes at a critical time, with Guthrie missing since February 1 and Nanos continuing to oversee the search.
Officials have not indicated that the probe has affected the investigation.
Who is Chris Nanos?
Chris Nanos is the elected sheriff of Pima County, Arizona, currently responsible for leading law enforcement operations in the region, including the ongoing search for Nancy Guthrie.
He began his career in policing with the El Paso Police Department in Texas in the 1970s. His tenure there, which is now under renewed scrutiny, included multiple disciplinary actions before his resignation in the early 1980s.
Nanos later continued his law enforcement career in Arizona, eventually rising through the ranks in Pima County. He went on to hold senior positions, including captain, before ultimately being elected sheriff.
Also Read: Nancy Guthrie update: Ex-FBI gives expert insight on Tommaso Cioni, Annie Guthrie’s involvement in kidnapping case
Despite the ongoing probe into his past and resume discrepancies, Nanos remains in office and continues to lead the investigation into Guthrie’s disappearance.
Both the inquiry into his background and the missing persons case remain ongoing.
What are the allegations against him?
The claims against Nanos largely relate to his early law enforcement career in Texas. Records reviewed by The Arizona Republic indicate that during his time with the El Paso Police Department between 1976 and 1982, he was suspended eight times, resulting in 37 days off duty.
The suspensions were linked to multiple allegations, including use of force, illegal gambling, insubordination, habitual tardiness, improper arrests, and dereliction of duty.
Further scrutiny comes from claims that Nanos resigned from the department in 1982 to avoid termination, despite his resume stating he remained there until 1984.
Also Read: Nancy Guthrie case: Ex-FBI agent explains how kidnappers have been acting in ‘bad faith’ from start
Another discrepancy involves his promotion to captain in Pima County, which his resume lists as 2007, while official records indicate 2009.
Responding to these issues, a Pima County spokesperson said: “Both date discrepancies were administrative in nature and were not intended to mislead or misrepresent Sheriff Nanos’ work history.”
Nanos’ attorney, James Cool, also defended him, stating: “Whatever the Sheriff did or did not do before being elected is necessarily unrelated to his performance of the duties of his office.”
🚨 BREAKING: Watch the full clip here ➤
