From a policy perspective, the need is clear for established protocols on how health-related information about public officials should be communicated. Advocating for regular health updates, especially when they potentially impact public duties, could be done respectfully and systematically, setting a precedent that enhances public engagement and trust while balancing transparency with privacy.
In recent weeks, the narrative enveloping President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s unexpected extension of his international visit has sparked a national conversation, rich with concern, speculation, and reflections on the essence of transparency in governance. Initially charted as official diplomatic engagements, President Tinubu’s travels to the Netherlands and Saudi Arabia were aimed at bolstering Nigeria’s economic and diplomatic relationships. However, his prolonged absence, marked by unscheduled stops in London and France, ignited a whirlpool of public curiosity that highlighted the delicate balance between the private health concerns of public figures and the public’s vested interest in the well-being of their leaders.
While I lack direct information about President Tinubu’s current health status, the amalgamation of his previously disclosed health issues and recent media coverage has prompted a deeper reflection on this matter. It’s important to recognize that President Tinubu, like any individual, may face health challenges, and as such, warrants the same level of empathy and understanding we would extend to anyone in a similar situation. This acknowledgment isn’t just about fairness; it’s a fundamental aspect of human compassion, emphasizing that public figures are not exempt from the vulnerabilities that accompany health issues.
In a true democratic society, while transparency is crucial, it is equally important to balance it with respect for personal privacy, especially regarding health-related matters. President Tinubu’s right to seek medical attention anywhere in the world should be uncontested. This is a fundamental right, not just for a president but for any individual. The focus should be on the nature of the presidency’s communication about such matters, ensuring it is timely and clear, thereby precluding unnecessary speculation.
The unfolding situation underscores the profound responsibilities borne by elected officials—not only to govern but to maintain the public’s confidence through openness and integrity. The initial lack of transparency regarding President Tinubu’s whereabouts may not have been an attempt at deception; rather, it likely arose from an antiquated notion that public figures must project an image of unwavering strength and vitality. This, however, often leads to an informational void, filled by speculation and concern from the public and media alike.
In response to growing rumors and to mitigate misinformation, the Nigerian Presidency released a video showing President Tinubu actively engaged in his duties at the Presidential Villa. This visual reassurance was meant to quash doubts about his ability to govern and to reaffirm his commitment to Nigeria’s future. The depiction of a leader, not only in charge but resilient, perhaps aimed to convey that despite any health challenges, he remains steadfastly dedicated to his role.
This incident powerfully illustrates why transparency about the health of public officials is crucial in a democracy. Transparency protects the integrity of the political office and builds trust within the electorate. Democracies thrive on accountability, and withholding critical health information can inadvertently erode public trust and destabilize effective governance.
The role of the media in reporting on the health of public figures is profoundly critical and comes with substantial ethical responsibilities. Journalists are tasked with balancing the public’s right to know against the individual’s right to privacy. This involves a rigorous commitment to ethical journalism that requires verifying facts before dissemination, steering clear of sensationalism, and handling sensitive information with the utmost respect for the dignity of those involved.
Moreover, when it comes to reporting on health matters, the media must navigate this terrain with particular care to avoid creating unnecessary panic or violating privacy. Reports should be grounded in verified information and presented with a high degree of sensitivity, emphasizing respect for personal dignity at every turn. Sensationalist or overly dramatic reporting does not just harm the individual—it can mislead the public and divert attention from more pressing, substantive issues. In this way, the media plays an indispensable role in shaping how health narratives about public figures are perceived, stressing the need for integrity and thoughtfulness in all journalistic endeavors.
From a policy perspective, the need is clear for established protocols on how health-related information about public officials should be communicated. Advocating for regular health updates, especially when they potentially impact public duties, could be done respectfully and systematically, setting a precedent that enhances public engagement and trust while balancing transparency with privacy.
At this critical juncture, extending empathy towards President Tinubu is not just important—it’s essential. Recognizing that even leaders are susceptible to health challenges can cultivate a compassionate response from the public. Such empathy needs to be woven deeply into our national discourse, fostering a culture in which health issues are neither stigmatized nor sensationalized, but met with understanding and maturity.
Emphasizing empathy underscores the human aspects of leadership, reminding us that leaders, like anyone else, can encounter personal health struggles. By nurturing a supportive atmosphere that recognizes these human vulnerabilities, society is better positioned to support its leaders effectively, especially during times of health crises. This approach ensures that empathy and understanding are the prevailing responses, rather than suspicion and sensationalism, thus strengthening the bond between the public and their leaders and enhancing mutual respect and trust.
Institutionalizing transparency can also transform public perception, illustrating that vulnerability in leaders is not a weakness but a facet of their humanity. Such openness reassures the public that their leaders are relatable and forthright, qualities foundational to trust and respect in any democratic society.
As Nigeria traverses these complex dynamics, the broader lesson is crystal clear: a harmonious balance between compassion and transparency not only fortifies democratic governance but also enriches the connection between a nation and its leaders. This period in President Tinubu’s tenure isn’t just a hurdle; it’s a crucial moment for elevating democracy and fostering deeper community understanding.
Ending on a lighter note, let’s remember “President Tinubu the Jagaban”—the big boss of Nigeria, the one who steers the ship in often turbulent waters. God gives and God takes, but thankfully, you’re back on home turf, President Tinubu. May Allah be with you at all times as you pilot this unique vessel called Nigeria.
Professor John Egbeazien Oshodi, born in Uromi, Edo State, Nigeria, is an American-based police and prison scientist, forensic psychologist, public policy psychologist, and legal psychologist. He’s a government advisor on forensic-clinical psychological services in the USA and the founder of the Dr. John Egbeazien Oshodi Foundation for Psychological Health. With a significant role in introducing forensic psychology to Nigeria through N.U.C. and Nasarawa State University, he’s also a former Secretary-General of the Nigeria Psychological Association. He’s taught at esteemed institutions like Florida Memorial University, Florida International University, Nova Southeastern University, and more, and is currently an online faculty member at Weldios University, Nexus International University, and Walden University. John.Oshodi@mail.waldenu.edu
